Selasa, 31 Agustus 2010

Quick Update: Interview with Congressman Ed Towns!

[Note: If you have not donated yet to the "Enough is Enough" campaign, please chip in $5-$10 today! I have sent off my forms to create a bank account for Education Matters. Once that is in place, I will be filling out the forms to turn us into a 501(c)(4). You can click on the "PayPal" button on the upper-left hand side of this page]. 

Thanks to a recently elected Board Member, Ms. Anna Schaefer, I will be setting up an interview with Congressman Edolphus 'Ed' Towns (10th Congressional District of New York). Anna appealed to Congressman Towns through Facebook. Here's what she wrote on August 30th:

Re: Please pass the College Debt Swap Act 2010.

Dear Congressman Towns:


We need you to help us to help the economy. This is our only hope to get back on our feet! We need help! Private loans have no consumer protections at all. Everything is in their favor. These lenders will do nothing to help us. It is in the hands of the Government, and the only avenue we have to be heard. Hear our pleas, help us so we can get our spending power back. We want to buy a house, but with these outrageous terms and the hold these private lenders have on us, that will never be possible. This is not a bailout we are asking for. We want our consumer rights back. Without consumer rights, how can we help the economy? 

Congressman Towns responded to Anna, writing:

Anna, 

I too want to help the economy, when we passed the Health Reform Bill there was little fan fair given to the education piece of the bill which allows students to borrow directly from the federal government to receive funding for college. As you know I am a co-sponsor of this legislation and when congress returns I will do my best to bring this issue to the attention of my colleagues. 

My next task is to get in touch with the sponsor of this Bill, Marcia Fudge (D-OH11), as well as the other co-sponsors. Finally, I look forward to interviewing Ed Towns. Stay tuned!

Senin, 30 Agustus 2010

Revolt en masse?

[Note: If you have not donated yet to the "Enough is Enough" campaign, please chip in $5-$10 today! I have sent off my forms to create a bank account for Education Matters. Once that is in place, I will be filling out the forms to turn us into a 501(c)(4)].

A civilization which leaves so large a number of its participants unsatisfied and drives them into revolt neither has nor deserves the prospect of a lasting existence. -Sigmund Freud

A highly educated connection, who is also an alum of Harvard, recently asked me about my thoughts on whether or not the indentured educated class ought to revolt en masse. As this reader indicated in their message, I have indeed been asked this question before, and many people have implored me to support such a move. I will refrain from sharing my thoughts (most of you already know my stance), but would like to know what you think. Should all student debtors revolt together? Would it work? Why or why not?

Minggu, 29 Agustus 2010

Debra Wiley at the Department of Education finally speaks!

"Knowing is not enough, we must apply. Willing is not enough, we must do." -Goethe

Recently in a piece entitled, "Who's gonna help students who have been defrauded?," I discussed the fact that there's been a lot of buzz about students who have been defrauded by higher education. In this piece I also implored the indentured educated class to reach out to Ms. Debra Wiley, who serves as the Ombudsman in the Department of Education. 

This focus of what's happened to students has been primarily on that of the for-profit institutions. While I think it's a step in the right direction, and I especially applaud Luke Swarthout in Senator Harkin's office for his work on the matter (incidentally, I've been in touch with Luke by phone and email, so he's fully aware of this movement to help the indentured educated class), I also think it is far too convenient to single them out. The problem is systemic and much broader than merely the for-profits taking advantage of students. For instance, in a conversation I had with author Claudia Dreifus last week we discussed the way in which higher education institutions are not monitored in any way and are able to drive the cost of tuition without having to justify it. Her husband, Andrew Hacker, who is also the co-author of their recent book entitled, Higher Education? How Colleges Are Wasting Our Money And Failing Our Kids - And What We Can Do About It, recently appeared on the Colbert Report. Colbert did a segment on for-profit institutions (see the embedded segment below; Hacker was quite funny). That is quite exciting to see, but we need to taking aim at all institutions of higher learning. (I will be featuring Ms. Dreifus this coming week. She was gracious enough to be interviewed about her work).

                   
The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Stephen Colbert University - Andrew Hacker
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes2010 ElectionFox News

 
Thanks to the indentured educated class we continue to collectively demand that individuals within the Department of Education and also elected officials. Our letters have, once again, made a difference. I also have to credit Ms. Wiley at the Department of Education for her response. After all, it's about time the Dept. of Education actually responded to our letters of concern. 

As part of another letter writing initiative, many of you sent letters to her. One particular reader wrote on August 25,2010:

Hello Debra,

My name is Mr. Z and I have some questions for you
concerning the student loan crisis.
 
The Department of Education is failing to help current debtors. Why
have they forgotten us? What is being done to help current debtors who
can't afford to pay high payments for their student loans? Why is
there no relief for the citizens of this country that worked hard to
obtain their degree, only to be eternally indebted to private banks
(for private loans) and risk destroying their credit and possibly
losing their jobs due to defaulting on student loans?

Thank you for your time,
Mr. Z

I wrote a similar letter and asked all of my readers to cc me on their notes to Ms. Wiley. As mentioned, Ms. Wiley responded. She made it clear to Mr. Z that his concerns were being added to a file and that the White House was also aware of the requests that we have been making with regard to the student lending crisis.

So if you haven't written to Ms. Wiley, please do so now (her email address is Debra.Wiley@ed.gov). When you do, please cc me on that email. That way, I can keep track of the number of letters we're sending to her, too. I encourage you to ask the same types of questions that Mr. Z asked her.
















Kamis, 26 Agustus 2010

Conversations with Candidates: Jim Holbert (KY's 5th Congressional District)




[This series of conversations with candidates is part of a new feature on Education Matters, and is entitled, "New Blood Needed For Bold Change: Cryn's Conversations With A New Type of Candidate." If you are a candidate running for office (city, state, or at the national level) and would like to be promoted on my site, please contact me at ccrynjohannsen@gmail.com. All candidates will have the opportunity to review the material I publish about them, so none of your words will be misconstrued. I'm happy to be of assistance in spreading the word about your candidacy, your values, and what you intend to do once elected. So far, I've interviewed Kevin Bradley (who's running as a Democrat for the House of Representatives, CO-5) and Rick Staggenborg, and he's running for U.S. as a Progressive in the state of Oregon.]

Talk about being hit by homesickness again - it had abated until this conversation. While speaking to Jim Holbert about politics, the past, and what needs to be done to help ordinary Americans, I noticed birds chirping in the background during our talk. I don't know when I heard birds chattering last, so it was a nice reminder that beyond the second largest city in the world, Nature in all of Her Glory is still alive and well, especially in the State of Kentucky. Those chit-chatting birds also reminded me of why I need to get back home. And it wasn't just the birds that made me feel that sense of urgency to return, but Jim's political ideas and passion. Here's what we discussed about his run for the U.S. House of Representatives in the 5th-Congressional District of KY:

CCJ: Jim, please allow me to first thank you for speaking to me about running for U.S. House of Representatives. You are a progressive Democrat, is that correct?


JH: Yes, that's right. That's fairly rare around these parts, but I think people are looking for 
answers.

CCJ: I see, and you're running for the 5th Congressional District in the fine state of Kentucky. Have you always described yourself as being a progressive Democrat?

JH: No. As a matter of fact, I was a Republican for many, many years. In the profession I was in - the military - political conservatism tends to dominate. But as I matured and got more work experience around the U.S. and paid closer attention to developments, I found that the prescriptions that the conservative movement had promoted were a failure. Republicans have prescribed some attractive solutions, but they don't seem to work in reality. We can just look at what has happened in the last 30 years in this country. It has been a series of disasters. Their theories sound good - you had that idea of trickle down economics, for instance, and that did not happen. Again, their ideas sound good in theory, but they don't  work. Instead, their ideas allowed the corporatists to take the money and the jobs. They gutted American jobs and have destroyed the American middle class.
 

CCJ: That sounds quite dismal, and I don't disagree. I think that President Reagan did a good job of unraveling a lot of the successful programs that FDR implemented, and that's one of the major problems with the U.S. From my perspective, I think it's easy to be hopeless. Based upon your remarks, are you as well?

JH: No, I have hope . . . a good deal of it, as a matter of fact. You're probably familiar with the saying: 'there's nothing done that can't be undone.' The people have to elect a critical mass in Congress, and I would say it will take around 300 progressive people in the House, and this will be the framework for change.

CCJ: I really like this idea that you just mentioned, i.e., that there's noting done that can't be undone. That reminds me that there is a lot of reason to still be hopeful. That's one of the reasons why I am seriously thinking about running for office, too.

JH: You should. There are lots of reasons to be hopeful.

CCJ: Who are your two favorite authors, and why?

JH: The fellow who had most influence on me early on is Bernard B. Fall. He was a Viennese refugee who fought in the resistance in France. His mother died in a concentration camp and his father was tortured and killed by the Gestapo. Fall moved to the U.S. and during his Doctoral work, he was encouraged to write about IndoChina during the years the French were fighting, and before we became involved there. He did a lot of research there, and wrote several books. As a young man coming up and preparing to get a commission as an Army officer during the last years of the war . . . . I never went to Vietnam, I graduated and was commissioned in 1975 . . .  but Fall was read by a lot of us. He left a lasting impression upon me as a younger man. He analyzed the France's political and military mistakes in Vietnam. He later predicted the U.S. debacle in Vietnam, too. That's because we began to make the same mistakes the French had made.. He was a tremendous scholar and remains highly regarded.  There are a lots of others . . . but for more general policy analysis, I'm looking at . . . hold on, I'm taking a look at my bookshelf [I hear rustling in the background]. Oh, here it is . . . have you heard of a guy named David Sirota?

CCJ: Yes, I am very familiar with his work.
 

JH: Well, he wrote a book called Hostile Takeover. That to me was a very well done expose of the past 30 years. On this topic, another very influential fellow who I think he should be read more is What's the matter with Kansas? by Thomas Frank. He followed-up with another excellent book called the Wrecking Crew.

I also want to mention Saul Alinsky - he called for the organizing of the middle class. He was a prophet and looked ahead thirty years. He made it clear back in the early '70s that the middle class would be sold out by the corporatists. That's why if we don't get organized today around electing some populists to office, we're over.



When it comes to the middle class organizing, I am optimistic, and that's not just rhetoric. Because there are a lot of people who have been politically asleep or politically misled, but they are starting to wake up and get involved. I can assure you I had very conservative values and for many years. That's why I am sure that a political reawakening is possible for millions of other people to wake up, too. If it could happen to a person like me, it's possible for anyone.
 
CCJ: I agree. It's amazing to see how many people are involved with the student lending crisis and who volunteer on behalf of the indentured educated class. I have a lot of theories on why so many Americans are finally waking up, but what are your thoughts on the matter?


JH: Well, Cryn, I think people have realized they've been sold a bill of goods, and there's nothing worse than an irate customer. We've tried with the best intentions, but it has failed.

Republicans, well, you see, they are not nonplussed about it. Even in the Reagan era Republicans had more integrity than today. But nowadays it's [the Republican Party] been hijacked by a bunch of lunatics. The struggle now among Republicans candidates is who can be crazier. Those who get marginalized are the ones who speak sensibly. That's because everyone has to throw meat that's redder and rawer than what was thrown yesterday. I think the future of the Republicans is that it will be a third party, a sort of regional party.



CCJ: Interesting. My father used to be a Republican, but that was when their values weren't so far off. For instance, he agreed with their support of small business and fiscal responsibility. Why were you a Republican for so many years?

JH: I was a Republican because the party used to have some good ideas. There's nothing wrong with fiscal conservatism. There was restraint in foreign policy, with an aversion to interventionism, and so forth. Where has that Republican Party gone? It doesn't exist anymore.

CCJ: Indeed, it used to be that the Democrats were known to be the warmongers.


JH: That's right.

CCJ: So shifting gears, let's talk about the Democratic Party. What are your thoughts about the Democrats these days?

JH: I am appealing to the people and wanting to resuscitate the notion that the Democratic Party is the Party of the Common Man. Unfortunately, it still sees itself as such, and there it takes too much for granted. It takes it for granted that people will feel that it has that orientation. But people have to have concrete results to be reassured that that's the case. When the party went to the left in the late '60s and '70s and started embracing second tier issues and putting them first, that's what drove the so-called Reagan Democrats to the Republican side. The Republicans at that time talked about bread-and-butter issues and Democrats stopped doing that, and the voters bolted. Democrats have taken their eyes off the bread-and-butter issues. And now the Republicans just lie about it. The middle class has been destroyed, jobs have been outsourced, and the country has been de-industrialized. Neither party is really doing much to help or change this situation.

CCJ: There's been a lot of buzz about distancing yourself from Obama as a Democrat. What are your thoughts about this, in my view, overly "sexy" discussion?

JH: That's a very topical question. To tell you the truth I think it's a bit presumptuous. It's really a bunch of hogwash if you ask me. But I'll get to the point: I support Obama in the same sense I supported Bush, or any President: I believe the best way to support people is to give them constructive criticism. The fact is, President Obama has lots and lots of advisors, and I think he's been taking lousy advice so far.

CCJ: I absolutely agree. I was a scholar at Harvard, and am aware of what Larry Summers did to that institution. I think he's awful, and that he shouldn't be an economic advisor to President Obama.

JH: He's not getting great advice when it comes to the economy. And at this point, the best thing I can say about Obama is that he's not a Republican. He punished the right-wingers on the Republican side, drove them out of office. But it will be nip and tuck in the next 6 years of the election cycles. The biggest problem for the Obama Administration, and don't get me started on those in Congress, but here's my biggest critique of President Obama and the Democrats: they squandered political capital. I don't think Obama realized how much political capital he had when he was elected. I suppose, 'Who I am to say this . . .'

CCJ: Well, you're a citizen whose voice matters, so you ought to have a take on these issues.

JH: Well, yes, that's right. In any event, when Obama was elected . . . I was running for Congress back then, already . . .  I was calling for a 'New' New Deal, and I think that if the Obama Administration had ramped it up by an order of more magnitude, and if Pelosi in the House, and the Dems in Senate, could have enforced party discipline, we could have had in just the first 6-8 months the following: real single-payer health care, an end ri both wars, and real work plan policy that would have created millions of new job. The last point would have been based upon a bottom up method. But frankly the Congress fooled around and Obama deferred to much of their foolishness. My wrath is really reserved for the Dems in the House and the Senate, especially the Senate. You see, when people are out of power, everyone is united. But once they've won and had that glass of victory champagne, it goes right to their head, and they get dis-united. Where did these Blue Dogs come from? And what about all this in-fighting? There should have been party unity. I fault Pelosi and Reid for that. They should have forced party discipline. People in the nineteenth century . . . they would've been very surprised to see Congress turning into a rubber stamp for the Executive Branch; it used to set National policy, and we need to get back to that. Obama should have shot higher. He came out with moderation, and that was a mistake, in my opinion.  If you go into negotiations wanting $1000, you start out asking for $10k; it’s the same principle.. I've been very disappointed over the last 20 months, especially with the lack of decisive action to end the wars and our involvement in that region, and with jettisoning the public option in health care, but the game is not over yet. He's [Obama] facing the biggest problem with the mid-terms and when he goes up for re-election in 2012. He's done a lot of good, yes. But is it going to be enough to get the economy out of the trash? Will it be enough to show people tangible benefits?  We’ll see.

CCJ: Sure. I can't disagree with what you're saying . . .

JH: Let me make one more point . . . The people who are really responsible are the Democrats. Because they are in charge. The thing to do is cowboy up, stop pointing fingers, and stop looking at the past. But if they want power for a generation, as they enjoyed after the Roosevelt era, they should start acting like it matters.

You see, Democrats used to be the party that got things done.

The best example is Franklin D. Roosevelt - early on in his administration he was already acting. The country demanded bold experimentation like that now. At that point, Roosevelt decided, 'We're going to try something. If it doesn't work, we'll admit it, and try something else.' This spirit has been completely lost. I always encourage Democrats to get back to their roots. The Democrats used to believe in things being possible. They used to believe that it was important to get things done, so for God’s Sake, we gotta get back to that.



But let me tell you that I have a burning message that I need to get out. Here's what I believe with all my heart. We waste time, money, and effort trying to lobby elected officials to vote in a populist way. They are not going to be lobbied like that. Why? Well, it's an easy answer. The other side has so much more money power than we do. The only way to solve it is this: we need to find progressive, populist people who are electable, and get behind them, and actually get them in office. The only way to make change is by electing new people into Congress. That's when Congress will vote our way and not the corporatist way. That's what it boils down to.

[Author] Charles Beard made it clear in 1913. He returned to Madison's original point, that's to say the Government is set up to protect monied interests, and it's done a great job of that so far. But bottom line is that they [the corporatist types] cut their own throats. Capitalism almost killed itself during the Great Depression, but Franklin Delano Roosevelt managed to save capitalism by making changes which were needed. Republicans hate Roosevelt, and yet he's responsible for saving capitalism from itself.

But the problem is that we needed Obama to be more of a Roosevelt. You see, in my view, capitalism is morphing back into a new age of feudalism. I don't think it's going to get that way, and I'll tell you why, because there will be a revolution first. It happened in the French Revolution. Worldwide unimpeded capitalism is morphing today into an Anciens Regime, and when that happens, revolution interposes itself. You know, I don't want to see my country in a revolution. It's bloody, it's messy, and it's economically draining. That's why we need that greatness that was felt from Roosevelt. Before Franklin, we had Teddy Roosevelt during the Guilded Age, and he interposed change and saved capitalism in his day, too. Then Franklin D. Roosevelt came along and saved it from itself again. But no one is here to save capitalism from itself now. Yet that's exactly what we need.



CCJ: I'm intrigued by your remarks about the uselessness of being an activist. You see, I am currently an advocate for student loan debtors and am oftentimes very frustrated by the silence from the Hill, the White House, and the Department of Education. It's as if nobody inside the Beltway really cares about the fact that millions of Americans are drowning in student loan debt, are defaulting, and suffering tremendously. That's actually one of the reasons why I am thinking about running for the U.S. House of Representatives, because we need to ensure that debtors' voices are also represented in D.C. At this juncture, they aren't being heard, and instead the student lending industry with all their lobbyists dominate those offices 24/7. I mean, I can't blame a lot of public servants. If that's what they're being fed, and that's who is supporting their campaigns for reelection, well, then of course they're going to side with the lenders. That needs to change.

JH: In my view, activism and lobbying are worthless. The bought-and-paid-for politicians’ positions on all sorts of things are clear.
 
Dirksen said long ago 'when I feel the heat, I see the light.' But that attitude no longer exists. That's to say their positions are staked out, bought and paid for, and therefore not subject to change despite political pressure from people. So . . . you have say Exxon-Mobil’s, or whoever it is, that guy in Congress, and he really doesn’t care how many people call his office, or shout in town halls. He knows he’s facing multi-million dollar campaign bills is now and those bills get paid by sticking to voting for the corporatist interests, so, they'll vote that way, end of story. That's why we need to get 'em out of Congress and get some populists in there.


CCJ: I agree entirely with you, and that's why I will run . . .
 
JH: Do it, Cryn. Just run. I decided to run in 2008 and ran as an Independent, and in this 2010 cycle I sought and won the Democratic nomination. My goal is to win the election, but failing that by running I can get things discussed in newspapers and on TV and radio that aren’t getting discussed now.  That's one level of victory.  I know I won't push Hal Rogers off his position, his positions are bought and paid for by the corporatist campaign money that keeps him in office.  But I am not going to allow the guy to run unopposed, as he has roughly half of his tenure. To do that is a complete perversion of democracy. The incumbent re-election rate is north of 90%, and yet the Country is falling apart. Something has got to be done. Whether we succeed or not doesn't matter. We have to do it. We have to step up. If we get beat, so what? We've lost nothing.

CCJ: That's inspiring, and I am sure my readers will agree with you. It's worth the fight. That's for sure. That's why I want to help spread the word about your candidacy.
 
JH: Let me give you an idea and see what you want to do with it . . . someone needs to do it, and maybe you are the person who could succeed at it - focus on having one goal and one goal only.


CCJ: I do. I am focused on the issue of education and the student lending crisis.
 
JH: That's good. Sign people up to commit to your cause, and have them send an allotment, let's say $10 a month. I know things are rough for people, but pretty much everyone can afford around $10 a month. If you can get a million people out of the US to do that over the course of an election cycle, you would generate $240 million. Let's say your overhead is nothing.

CCJ: My overhead would be next to nothing. I am doing all this advocating now, and I'm able to finance it on my own. That's thanks to the fact that the cost of living in Korea is so low, and I am able to teach. However, I'd like to find a way to actually return to the U.S. and make this a full-time job.


JH: Sure. I understand. If you were able to raise that type of money, you could channel it into progressive candidates. In one fail swoop, you would in effect enact the same thing as Government financed campaigning. At this juncture, we can't raise any money, because corporations won't give us any money. Moreover, I'm in one of the poorest districts in the U.S., so there aren't a lot of donors.


If I had twenty-five thousand dollars, that would could farther in this district than 10 times that amount in a NY district. If I had that type of money, I could rock this campaign. Right now, I'm rockin' a lot of boats. Problem here, this guy has never had any real opposition. He's made deals with everybody in both Parties. If he goes away all these rice bowls get broken. 55% of this District is registered as a Democrat, but when they vote, 66% of them vote for Republican Hal Rogers. Why? Because he's Mr. Pork. Everybody has some kind of deal with him. If he goes away, the rice bowl goes away.

Sad thing is, these coal operators are destroying this part of the country. When that resource is gone, this place is going to be a crater. They have about 20 or 30 years of resources left down here. When it’s gone, they’ll be gone too.  All these coal and energy companies in these parts . . . it's all remote ownership - most the companies are located up in Pennsylvania, New York, and Virginia. The only reason they care anything about this region is because of the money that can still be made here. Sure they'll come down here ever once and in a while, with crocodile smiles, and when someone gets killed, they shed some crocodile tears. But they only really care about getting the resources the cheapest way possible, and that is with mountain top removal mining - consequences be damned, the public will end up paying for the consequences, not them. When the resource is gone the corporatists will pull up stakes, and the morning after they are gone this region  will make Tobacco Rd look like New York’s Upper Eastside.

CCJ: Interesting. That sounds pretty devastating. On another issue, what are your thoughts on education?
 
JH: Well, you see, when it comes to education issues, this is what I think: jobs and education are on two sides of the same coin. As Alinksy pointed out, all of these problems are interrelated. If you try to address everything in a context you begin to see behind the problems, and you understand that there is a common source for all of these crises. That's to say the capitalists have hijacked the Government, and they are the reason why we have all these war problems, job problems, education problems, and so forth.

CCJ: Well, I don't disagree. Jim, it was an absolute pleasure to speak with you today, and I look forward to supporting your candidacy. Please let me know how I can be of service.
 
JH: You bet, Cryn. You feel free to call me anytime. I'm happy to talk with you. Good luck with your own plans to run for U.S. House of Representatives!







Rabu, 25 Agustus 2010

"It's a do or die situation:" Contribute to the Enough is Enough Campaign!



Nicholas Sacca is one of many State Support Leaders for the Support Group for the Indentured Educated Class. He has set up a meter to measure the money we are raising. It's my new campaign entitled, Enough Is Enough! I am going to raise $6000 for the Indentured Educated Class, and every penny will be accounted for. Every dime will go towards helping you as a debtor. So please donate $5 and spread the word. This movement is about you, and I intend to continue raising money so that I can return and run for office and represent the needs of ordinary Americans.



Remember: Fair is Fair!

Are you . . .

as one of my readers called herself, "first generation indentured screwed?"

Senin, 23 Agustus 2010

Who's gonna help students who have been defrauded?

There's all this chatter and activity swirling around students who have been defrauded by higher education institutions. I think that's just swell, and I especially applaud Luke Swarthout in Sen. Harkin's office for his work on the for-profit scandals. But it seems to me that no one is doing anything to help students who have been defrauded (it doesn't matter if they went to a for-profit or non-profit). Why not? In my view, this means the Department of Education is left off the hook. This institution has done nothing to help current debtors, and I think that's a disgusting shame.

Debra Wiley is a prime example. She responded to my pleas for help several months ago, and claimed that she'd opened a file for my concerns and claims. (She's at the Dept. of Education). However, I haven't heard a thing out of her since that first email. Well, that doesn't work for me. Nope. It don't suffice. That's why I want all of you to email her and ask her why the Department of Education has failed to respond to the needs of student debtors. Why are they taking our concerns for granted? Why is the Administration helping out homeowners and ignoring us?  

PLEASE EMAIL DEBRA WILEY AND CC ME. HER EMAIL IS: Debra.Wiley@ed.gov. Ask her why the Department of Education is failing to help current debtors. Why have they forgotten us?!?


Fated to be forgotten and forsaken?
 

Conversations with Candidates: Rick Staggenborg

[This is a new series entitled, "New Blood Needed For Bold Change: Cryn's Conversations With A New Type of Candidate." If you are a candidate running for office (city, state, or at the national level) and would like to be promoted on my site, please contact me at ccrynjohannsen@gmail.com. All candidates will have the opportunity to review the material I publish about them, so none of your words will be misconstrued. I'm happy to be of assistance in spreading the word about your candidacy, your values, and what you intend to do once elected.]



Rick Staggenborg is running for U.S. Senate in the state of Oregon as a Progressive. We spoke last week about: (a) what he plans to do once he's elected, (b) his background as a VA psychiatrist; (c) and what America needs to do in order to heal itself as a society. Here's our conversation:

CCJ: What issues  matter to you most?

RS: Naturally, health care, election reform, and restoring the economy. But the most important thing to me is abolishing corporate personhood – that last point is especially critical. So I am reaching out and trying to connect to everybody. That’s the only way we’re going to succeed and get things done.

CCJ: What ticket are you running on?

RS: The Progressive ticket. It is the fastest growing Party in Oregon, having obtained ballot status in just over a year. We want people to know they don't have to choose between bad or worse any more. Both major Parties have sold out to the corporations who are bleeding the US economy dry while destroying the educational system.


CCJ: What do you think motivated you to get involved with politics and to follow it closely? 

RS: My brother was in the Vietnam War, and I witnessed firsthand how devastating war can be, the kind of trauma it creates. It’s not just trauma at the individual level, but at a societal level. That’s one of our problems today. I intend to mend those problems as a Senator.

CCJ: How old were you at the time of the Vietnam War?

RS: I was 10 years old.

CJ: What's your political platform?

RS: If we abolish corporate personhood, i.e. this idea that corporations have a Constitutional right to buy out Senators, we can get rid of their tools in the Senate. Together, we will make sure our children will obtain a good education, decent health care, and all the basic rights. This will ensure that citizens will be prepared to lead this nation in the decades to come. We can end war and save the economy. If we abolish corporate personhood, we won’t have international corporations running the government and they won’t be outsourcing our jobs. Moreover, we will be able to end the corrupt system of corporate welfare that is bankrupting the country at the expense of those whom our Senators were elected to serve.

Indeed, people were up in arms about the recent bailouts  - the finance/banking and auto industries -  but most Americans don’t realize that the health care "reform bill" passed by Congress was yet another bailout. This time it was for the medical insurance companies that are bleeding school districts and making teachers the targets of average citizens. Too many Americans have bought the line that unions are destroying companies and driving up costs. They seem to want the U.S. to lead the race to the bottom by destroying what little power the unions have to protect workers rights. The fact is, unions today represent only  a small fraction of U.S. workers and the largest represents some of the poorest workers. Even though the unions do little but fight for the right to decent medical care at the expense of all other benefits, SEIU declined to back single payer health care because the President is too cozy with a Democratic Party that criticizes unions for backing their own choice rather than that of the DCC.

Finally, most Americans have no idea that corporations are heavily subsidized by the U.S. Government, and that needs to change. The psychopathic [my emphasis] CEOs who buy our Senators have not delivered on the jobs they promised. The banksters are not lending the tax money we gave them and don't seem to realize that if President Obama were to make good on his threat that banks too big to fail must be broken up, they will lose their ability to make war at will for fun and for profit. Then our kids will have a choice to work in a "peace time" economy rather than being forced to join the military to obtain an education. The education they receive in war is one that they will take back to America, to their and our detriment. In France, the citizens there have received universal health care, worker protection laws, and a strong unemployment policy. That's to say, there is a relatively vibrant and locally based economy in France. We can do it here too.

CCJ: So to clarify, you are saying that we need to abolish corporate personhood entirely?

RS: Yes. Exactly.

CJ: With this in mind (i.e., corporate personhood dominating in the political sphere), what are your thoughts on the Supreme Court ruling?

RS: Umm . . . I was actually celebrating that night, and I knew that decision would bring conservatives and liberals together. For instance, I was at a so-called debate in Oregon in my district. The incumbent didn’t show up. However, the Tea Party candidate was there. He said the government owns the means of production and he called that socialism. I said to him, 'Well, it sounds to me like you’re actually talking about communism, not socialism.' He replied, 'No, I’m talking about Fascism.' I thought that was pretty telling that he admitted that.

CCJ: What about your politics? Can you tell us a little more about where you stand, i.e., how do you define yourself as a candidate? 

RS: I define myself as a radical centrist, meaning that I want to include everyone when considering my responsibility as a Senator. I am running as a Progressive because everyone knows that we need radical change to take back our government and make it work in the interests of the People. That is the definition of progress, in my view. Conservatives and Liberals are engaged in a Civil War at a time when we should be getting together to finish the American Revolution. If the People of this country took back control of their language instead of letting the corporate media define the debate, we would see the end of the two-Party system in the U.S. and the rise of Parliamentary-style democracy in America.

CCJ: Tell us a little more about your education and your background.

RS: I treated former military service members in the VA. Most of my patients were combat veterans and were victims of rape in the military. The vast majority of patients thus suffered from PTSD. The job seemed easy at first. After all, I’ve been doing treating PTSD and other trauma-induced conditions my entire career. But after more time with these patients, it became really interesting. My veterans forced me to look at the balance between my use of medications and the use of my skills in listening, empathizing with their experiences, and helping them recover from their trauma by accepting that the horrible violence that they suffered and inflicted upon others does not irretrievably damage their souls. In a word: redemption is possible. It is easier to deliver this message to people of faith, which fortunately most combat veterans are.

Before that I worked in a County Mental Health system treating the poor. I built several mental health programs. These included a major upgrade of the County program and again at the Bandon, Oregon VA Community Based Outreach Clinic. I was the Acting Associate Chief of Staff for Mental Health for ten months during the roll out of the Uniform Services Benefits Package for Mental Health Services in 2008. During that time I took the lead in establishing a new program for mental health in Brookings, Oregon that expanded to serve Crescent City, California. Our clinic nurse manager did the lion's share of the work in the Crescent City expansion project, however.

I always used some therapy in my work, but prior to the VA the load was too heavy to do much in-depth work with those who needed it the most. So it was generic counseling and cognitive behavioral therapy until I started working with veterans. I really began to listen to their experiences. I really think I understand what it’s like to be in combat. Stop The Madness : The Diary of a Soldier For Peace in the War to Take Back America is a book of essays that I am writing online at the website of Soldiers For Peace International, an organization I founded. It is comprised of a group of veterans and active duty service members from around the world who are dedicated to bringing permanent peace to the planet. In the book, I wrote about it in American’s borderline split. I discussed how people have trouble integrating the good and bad. That's why we so oftentimes we regard one another as enemies.(Incidentally, I wrote an essay about this subject, too, and it's entitled, "Healing American Borderline Split." It's a look at society from a psychiatric perspective).


CCJ: So what does your take on trauma and treating soldiers with PTSD mean when it comes to democracy and American society at large? 

RS: We cannot have democracy when we live in a country whose citizen's believe that they are not capable of governing themselves [my emphasis]. If we cannot govern ourselves then an oligarchy will inevitable arise that will do it for us. That is how we ended up with a fascist government in America.  Sinclair Lewis warned us about this in It Can't Happen Here. That was written before the start of WWII, but the warning was forgotten in the wake of victory. That is, if we fall into the trap of thinking it is best to accept the claim “We’ll lead you, we’ll protect you,” we accept a Fascist perspective. Moreover, it’s a disturbing part of the so called "conservative" mentality we’re seeing right now in this country. They are fearful of change, and  yet screaming for it. They need to know that the real enemy of democracy is the corporations that can afford to buy our Senators off with a fraction of the tax money they get in return. When they do, we will take back our country together, as good Americans should. 


CCJ: What are your thoughts on President Obama’s work so far?

RS: I read The Audacity of Hope and I think that he knows what’s wrong with the country. He could do a lot more. One example of what he could have done on his own is to repeal  ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ by Executive order. Truman desegregated the military that way and it is much stronger as a result. The only thing stopping him is that he has to pander to the religious fundamentalists who are a driving force in the conversion to fascism. They reject the First Amendment, accepting the corporate version of American history and trying to force-feed it to our children by taking over the Board of Education in Texas and trying to do the same in California, between which the texts the children use across America are selected.

These same people support the privatization of education through a voucher system at the taxpayer expense, and this amounts to a subsidy of the rich who can afford decent private schools to brainwash their kids while poor people can only afford education for profit that gives a cut-rate education where kids get the same corporate propaganda. Once again, they are feeding the race to the bottom, at least for those who are not already rich. They are trying to create a "separate but equal" system of education. The only thing equal in this scheme is that are children are being exposed to a Bolshevized version of our history.

Nevertheless, I think President Obama is doing good things, like de-privatizing student loans. But he needs to scrap other worthless programs such as the ‘No Child Left Alone’ program. In my view, it should be the states who Truman desegregated the military that way and it is much stronger as a result. The only thing stopping him is that he has to pander to the religious fundamentalist who are a driving force in the conversion to fascism. They reject the first amendment, accepting the corporate version of American history and trying to force-feed it to our children by taking over the Board of Education in Texas and trying to do the same in California, between which the texts children use across America are selected.

CCJ: I realize you are running as a Progressive, but it sounds like you align yourself more closely with Democrats, correct? So, let’s presume you side mostly with Democrats, should you distance yourself from President Obama? The media is playing this idea up at the moment.

RS: Well, he’s our president and we need to support him. We certainly need to criticize him when he’s not doing the right thing. But it’s a shame, because he doesn’t have a Senate behind him to help him get things done. We need to treat him with civility as any president ought to be treated. If we’d criticized Bush in a way that wasn’t so personal, we might have gotten things done or accomplished things. The corporate media divides for the benefit of the politicians and the corporate interests who back them. They’re deliberately drawing parallels, so that we say, 'well, what’s the point? Nothing will ever change. I’m giving up.' That means people will be more inclined to just abandon their rights as citizens. We are bringing up an entire generation that depends on us to properly educate them in their duties as citizens, but their parents have already given up trying to sort through the corporate propaganda. This sets us up to lose our democracy because our children no longer understand what that even means.

CCJ: What author matters to you, and why?

RS: Robert Putnam, a Harvard Sociology professor, wrote Bowling Alone. It extensively documents the decline of civility and social capital in American society dating back to the Vietnam War. My Senate campaign, as well as Soldiers for Peace International, is built upon the premise that we need to rebuild the infrastructure of society in order to heal the world and ourselves, too.

We can restore a vibrant economy that provides real jobs for Americans by eliminating corporate personhood. Few Americans know or appreciate how much of our tax money goes to privately owned corporations that exist only to generate [their own] profits, some of which is used to continue feeding the public trough by supporting the campaigns of their tools in the Senate. The financial bailout is just one example of all of this systemic corruption. In my view, that is what is bankrupting our country. We could bring those jobs back from overseas, get out of WTO, forget NAFTA, and all the other ‘aftas they are after. An important point is that we need to convert an economy and a decentralized green power generation that is owned by the people in their communities. The profit could help fund local health clinics and schools, but senators overall are only interested in keeping their jobs, and these problems don’t matter to them.  I think that they will be in for a rude surprise when the voters of America turn to third Parties to solve the problem of the wholesale purchase of our government by special interests.
 

CCJ: So what's your view on government and economic benefits . . . ?

RS: We need to help build communities. All politics is international and everything we do nationally reverberates locally and vice versa. Our Federal Government could get this off the ground by subsidizing micro-business – solar power is just one example of how they could help locally. For instance, it would be a great investment to emulate the German system of subsidizing low-interest loans to homeowners to install wind and solar generators on their rooftops. They pay back the loans at an accelerated rate by making the private power companies buy the excess at ten times the market rate until the homeowner pays back the loan with interest, thus feeding the program so that it can be extended to even more citizens. In the end, everyone benefits. The people get free power and money to fund local services, the government gets a return on their investment, the power company is spared the expense of building dirty coal, nuclear and oil power plants and the general public is not forced to pick up the bill for these in inflated power rates.

CCJ: Thanks you so much again for this interview. We will support your candidacy and look forward to your victory, Rick!

RS: Thanks for the interview, Cryn. I look forward to staying in touch and hope your readers reach out to me and support my run for U.S. Senate in Oregon.

 

Minggu, 22 Agustus 2010

New Blood Needed For Bold Change: Cryn's Conversations With A New Type Of Candidate

[This series of conversations with candidates is part of a new feature on Education Matters. If you are a candidate running for office (city, state, or at the national level) and would like to be promoted on my site, please contact me at ccrynjohannsen@gmail.com. All candidates will have the opportunity to review the material I publish about them, so none of your words will be misconstrued. I'm happy to be of assistance in spreading the word about your candidacy, your values, and what you intend to do once elected.]



Graydon Carter recently remarked, in a piece about the dramatic formation of power in Washington, D.C., "Congress has become [thanks to the overwhelming influence of lobbyists and other special interest groups] a virtual prison to special interest, and is in many ways now defunct as a truly deliberative body."

That's why we need to elect a slew of populists and regain control of the legislative branch for American citizens (and those who'd like to become citizens for that matter). But more on that later.

In the past few weeks I have had the honor and privilege of speaking to several candidates who are running for national office. They echoed the same remarks as Mr. Carter, and firmly believe that things need to change in Washington. (Incidentally, I plan on interviewing as many candidates as possible before the mid-term elections). So far, I've spoken with Kevin Bradley (he's running for the U.S. House of Representatives, CO-5), Rick Staggenborg (he's running for U.S. Senate in Oregon as a Progressive), and Jim Holbert (who's running for the U.S. House of Representatives, KY's 5th Congressional District). I have several more interviews lined up as well. All of these candidates agree that things in D.C. need to change. Moreover, living  and advocating for student debtors in D.C. made me realize even more just how broken the system presently is. Mr. Carter observation is therefore something I'd like to focus on throughout this series of interviews with various candidates running for office.

A broken system does not doom us, however. That is why we desperately need change. So I cannot disagree with Mr. Carter's remarks. If we accept Mr. Carter's analysis, and I would assume many of you do, it means we have neither the time to despair nor the luxurious opportunity to merely critique a "failing government." This broken system must be repaired, and it is fast becoming my generation's responsibility to do just that.

But what about this word that's included in the title of this piece? That word - change - in the past year has been tarnished. Unless someone has been in a two year coma (and I'm using that word deliberately), we all know it is the rhetoric that was used by President Obama when he was running for office. Indeed, it was the crux of his platform, and what helped inspire millions of voters to turn out and elect him (I being one of them). Now both the left and the right (and everything in between) are tearing those words apart. So much for hope, right? This effectively renders the possibility for change impossible. Everywhere he turns, President Obama is mercilessly ridiculed for using such bold words. Even worse, the mainstream media has the audacity to compare him to the failings of President Bush. Talk about an effective way to diminish the change he hope to bring to D.C and to the rest of the country. And so across my grand, collapsing country the good ol' boys and hippies, the pretentious new-speak gossipers (who were formally known to be journalists) and ill-informed voters bemoan, bash, and berate the beleaguered President. It's much like Dionysus. Obama becomes the exalted God only to be shred to pieces much to the delight of all the spectators. In this way, we Americans have been able to, quite conveniently, conclude that President Obama is a failure (we are spoon fed this gruel by the babbling idiots on our TVs). That's why the media is a culprit, and would prefer - overall - to discuss frivolities (that's a tactic that effectively distracts us as viewers). They like to discuss what the President ate for breakfast or raise "penetrating" questions about whether or not he's a Christian, rather than focusing on issues that effect millions of Americans.

Indeed, it's so easy to believe he has failed the American people. No matter what occurs, be it a natural disaster such as a hurricane, the Great Oil Spill of 2010, increased unemployment, homes being lost, etc., etc., President Obama is to blame. Hell, I've blamed him for my own self-imposed exile. He's probably caused your toast to burn today!

So, yes, it's so easy to blame one man. I've done it (as I already said). Hell, who hasn't condemned him? And that makes it easy to forget who was in office for the past eight years (Oh, how I detest Americans' political amnesia).

But why do we place so much blame on the President and the executive branch for that matter? In my view, it is time to shift the blame and the raw critiques to another branch of government: the legislative branch. They are, after all, supposed to be direct representatives of the people. 


In my next conversation with Jim Holbert, we will talk about the importance - the necessity - to reinforce the power of the legislative branch. According to Jim, their lack of power is one of the gravest problems when it comes to both national and local politics. This branch ought no longer be a virtual prisoner to special interest groups. This branch ought to be reclaimed by the people, and that's one of the reasons why I intend to also run for the U.S. House of Representatives.

Rabu, 18 Agustus 2010

Are you in default? If so, what's it like?




Many of my readers are wanting to know who is in default and what it is like for them. If you could share about your everyday life experiences as a defaulter, that would be great. Those who have recently defaulted are fearful, and wanting to hear stories from those who are familiar with life as a defaulter. Sadly, many of these individuals are depressed and even suicidal. But please keep in mind, suicide is not the answer. We need to unite and end this injustice. We need to do this together. America is facing a new type of civil rights struggle, and that's why indentured educated citizens need to come together and fight for their rights. And let me tell you, I'm fired up and ready to go! Let's be heard in D.C. Let's scream at the top of our lungs and demand change.

On another note, my big mission is to become a non-profit and also put up an ad on Facebook for the indentured educated class. This initiative is called the "Enough is Enough" campaign. Please spread the word and donate a few dollars (every little penny counts). I started the campaign yesterday and have already raised over $150. But I need a lot more. Rest assured, every cent will be accounted for. This money is not going to produce worthless products, but an advertisement for those of you who desperately need to be heard. So please spread the word and chip in if you can!

FAIR IS FAIR - Enough Is Enough! Let's start advertising NOW! (DONATE BELOW)

Note to reader: please listen to the video while reading the post. It will enhance your experience and turn you into an indentured educated rebel! 

NOW IS THE TIME TO TAKE ACTION. DONATE TODAY. DO NOT WAIT. WE NEED TO START FIGHTING FOR OUR RIGHTS NOW.

Call it what you will - cheesy, poorly executed campiness, or whatever - but one thing holds true, at least for me, when it come to the epic film, The Legend of Billy Jean: it roused feelings and the understanding of what is at stake when you make the decision to do the right thing, even if that means losing everything. The best moment was when Billy Jean was in the mansion they'd decided to squat in (they found they weren't alone and a rich, nerdy boy was living there). In the cool, gated mansion, Billy Jean, the classic proletariat bandit, watches the famous 1957 version of Joan of Arc (written by one of my favorites, Graham Greene). The shot juxtaposes Billy's beautiful profile to the grainy black-and-white image of the Saint being tied to a stake and burned alive. Billy is even more determined to fight. Freeing herself from the vulnerable image of a pretty, poor, blonde girl, she takes shears and butchers her hair, and thus becomes the 1980s image of a saintly rebel. 

Billy Jean was a hero to me when I was an angst-ridden kid in the late '80s.

She's inspired me again, and so has a feisty female reader. I'm kicking off a new campaign to raise money within a month to buy advertising space for the indentured educated class. The University of Phoenix and other insidious institutions put out bait for fresh catch every where. We're up against a massive campaign to convince people that pursuing higher education is worth it. But as the indentured educated class we have come to realize that it's a scam. That's why we need to spread the word and do it on search engines. I am asking everyone to donate between $25-$50 to this campaign (or anything you can pitch in). Plus, I urge you to spread the word. Tell your friends, your family, your neighbors. Tell everyone. Even just $5 will help! An advertising banner on a search engine will do wonders for this cause. So please donate today. Don't wait! Every single dime will go towards this banner, and we will see results.

Moreover, this money will help me finally becoming a 501. I need to do it immediately. 


Enough is enough. Fair is Fair!



 

Selasa, 17 Agustus 2010

Suicide Among Student Debtors - Who's Thought About It?

There are quite a number of articles about the concern that suicide rates will increase vis-a-vis to the increased number of people who are facing long-term unemployment (here's the most recent one I've come across). But what about those who are struggling to pay their student loans? Here are several more personal questions I have about this highly sensitive topic:

-Have you contemplated suicide because of the amount of student loan debt you owe?

-Have you started engaging in risky behavior (heavy drinking, using drugs, etc.) because of your student loan debt?

-Are you taking medications, such as anti-anxiety pills or anti-depressants, to cope with being an indentured educated citizen?


SponsorChange.org's new campaign, "The Big Pay Back!" Are you involved with it yet?

It's an honor and a privilege to be SponsorChange.org's new Online Brand Advocate. In this new role, I have been able to also be a co-writer on the press release for their exciting new campaign called "The Big Pay Back." I hope all of you get involved, so that you can bring SponsorChange.org to your neighborhood. Here are the details:

Obtaining a college degree is one of the most important investments a person can make. Without a degree it is very difficult to compete in the job market. Indeed, an individual without a degree knows how difficult it is to compete, especially in today’s market. However, the recent economic downturn has affected millions of graduates. Many of them cannot find gainful employment, and as a result they are left with shattered expectations and, far worse, the devastating burden of student loan debt. Instead of the hope of finding a new home to start a family, individuals are frantically searching for a second job. These financial challenges mean that these individuals are retreating from things that matter most: community involvement and family time. They are torn away from all types of social activities, something that does not help their sense of self-worth.

As a young person, who has gone to college and has struggled with student loan debt, SponsorChange.org’s Co-Founder and CEO Raymar Hampshire knows firsthand the way in which student loan debt can cripple one’s aspirations and life goals. Our team also knows why it is important to pay off student loan debt through service. Not only are we enabling people to lift the burden of being a helpless student debtor, we’re also providing individuals with a sense of purpose. In this way, student debtors are able to empower themselves, while working in the community as a volunteer. Also our team knows how alleviating student loan debt through service can empower individuals to pursue what’s most important to them. 


Over the past year, we have read thousands of your emails and listened to hundreds of your calls on the challenges of managing student loan debt and how SponsorChange.org is desperately needed in your city. Government alone will not be able to solve this problem, and we should not expect it to. Change must begin with you, with me, with us. That’s why we are launching this next major initiative – SponsorChange.org’s The Big Pay Back - and bringing our vision of service to your neighborhood.  This is a volunteer position and our goal is for city team leaders to work in groups of 3-5. What's really nice is that teams can agree to low, mild, and/or high levels of engagement for the Big Pay Back National Awareness Campaign.  

The following are ways that volunteer city team leaders can participate in the SponsorChange.org’s “Big Payback”!

Low Engagement

Place a SponsorChange.org badge on your website/blog linking to SponsorChange.org website.
Reach out to people and have them sign-up to SponsorChange.org social media sites.

Mild Engagement 

Agree to raise money to print SponsorChange.org branded t-shirts.
Identify a local Point of Contact (POC) who can be available to help identify speakers for local SponsorChange.org events.

High Engagement

Formally agree to host the following activities over the course of a year:

a. Hold at least 2 local activities to support the national awareness of student loan debt and the SponsorChange.org movement in local cities and towns, i.e., have a informational lunch, host a happy hour, organize a service a project, organize a panel discussion, etc. - these activities are all geared to help people learn about what SponsorChange.org can do to help you and your community.

b. Sponsor at least one SponsorChange.org fundraiser (This will be used to sponsor a future service project in your city).

By hosting local events in your community, leadership teams will agree to do the following:

1. Share participant lists with SponsorChange.org Headquarters (hq@sponsorchange.org).
2. Provide a summary of the event and ideas to SponsorChange.org’s Headquarters.
3. Be the spokespeople for SponsorChange.org’s Big Pay Back campaign in print, television and other media oulets.

In return, SponsorChange.org will provide you with the following:

1. Recognize your city's activities in the Philanthroteer.
2. Provide agenda templates for events.
3. List your event on SponsorChange.org.
4. Provide you with a video from the Co-Founder and CEO, thanking participants for joining the event.

As a result of your leadership, future opportunities will be available for your contribution to be recognized. This list is only a beginning. The team at SponsorChange.org is interested in any creative or innovative ways team leaders in your city can join with us and come together as we never have, to serve millions of young leaders who are crippled by student loan debt.

If you are interested in becoming a volunteer city leader, email your cover letter and resume to info@sponsorchange.org, subject line " Team Leader" and "City."



Senin, 16 Agustus 2010

Yet another reason why Education Matters

In their new book, Financing Higher Education Worldwide: Who Pays? Who Should Pay?, D. Bruce Johnstone and Pamela N. Marcucci, they begin their discussion with this point:

"Higher education in the twenty-first century has become increasingly important. Not only to individuals - bringing enriched lives, enhanced status, and greater earning power - but also to society at large, fostering economic prosperity generally, as well as the advancement of democracy and social justice [my emphasis]."

While I am critical of the way in which the Obama Administration is failing to respond to current debtors (they really aren't helping in the least, and that is what needs to change), it is nevertheless heartening to have a President in the White House who sincerely cares about education. (I have never questioned his commitment to promoting the importance of higher education). Indeed, he would agree with Johnstone's and Marcucci's points above. God forbid the day we have a President who doesn't give a damned. That's when the U.S. will certainly be over as an Empire. That's why it is important to ensure that he wins the next election.

Sabtu, 14 Agustus 2010

Interview with Kevin Bradley, Candidate Running for U.S. House of Representatives in the State of Colorado

Mr. Kevin Bradley and I recently connected through a mutual friend (who is now, incidentally, the Communications Director for his campaign). It is with great pleasure to share this interview I had with him this past week. I've included my introductory email, too.

Dear Kevin (if I may):

Thank you for allowing me to interview you for Education Matters. So you are aware, I am an advocate for student loan debtors in the U.S. Education Matters is the place where I write about my research on the student lending crisis. I feature debtors on a regular basis, and try to stay in touch with leaders in D.C. about this issue. That is my primary focus. However, the student lending crisis intersects with all the major issues/other crises that the U.S. is facing today, i.e., stagnant wages for the lower- and middle-classes, unaffordable health care, home foreclosures, etc.

That's just a very brief introduction, so you know who I am and what I am about. So, without further adieu, let's get down to the questions. 

CCJ: Kevin, tell us a little bit about yourself. Where did you grow up? What is your family like? Where did you go to school, and what did you study? Does your personal background influence your professional life? If so, how? What were some of the values your family instilled in you, and have those values affected your politics? 

KB: I was born and raised in Denver, Colorado.  I am the second of four children. I have an older brother and a younger brother and sister. As the “middle child” I was the peacemaker and go-between. My father was an accountant and mid-level manager at Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph, later Mountain Bell, later US West, currently Qwest.  My mother was a “stay at home” mom until I was in middle school. She returned to the workplace when all of her children were in school.  My mom returned to college at the same time that I enrolled, and she got a couple degrees in Nursing. She eventually became a registered nurse. My father was a company man and as his son, it was my job to test his choices in my own life. My parents gave me every opportunity to succeed and a sterling example of what it takes [to do so].

I attended Denver Public Schools throughout Denver during the era of court-ordered desegregation.    Beginning in my junior year in high school, I participated in the non-profit public health care organization Amigos de las Americas, traveling to Ecuador, Bolivia, Guatemala, and Honduras to provide a variety of health care services in rural Latin America.

I started my collegiate studies at Metropolitan State College, paying for it by working part-time. Back then, tuition for a full load semester was about $250 and the minimum wage was $1.20. I graduated from Metropolitan State College in 1981 with a B.A. in Spanish with a minor in Marketing. After a couple of years working I took my savings, applied for a student loan, and headed for Glendale, Arizona where I had been accepted to the American Graduate School of International Management (now the Thunderbird School of Global Management). In addition to taking out loans and relying upon my savings, I held a part-time job at Thunderbird Samaritan Hospital. I graduated from Thunderbird in 1985 with a Master’s degree in International Management.  Even though the loan was modest and reasonable, I quickly discovered that I had to secure a “good,” well-paying job.  I finally finished paying off my student loan six years after graduation.  My loan was very modest by today's standards and the interest rate was guaranteed and reasonable.

CCJ: What are you running for, and why are you running for office now? 

KB: I am running the United States House of Representatives CO-5.  It is one of the most Conservative Districts in the Country.  Since this District was created (due to population growth) 38 years ago, it has been held by Republicans.

CCJ: How are you raising awareness about your campaign? How can volunteers help you win this forthcoming election?

KB:  I am running for this office with the firm conviction that apathy and ignorance are the real enemies of democracy. The view that government is “them” not “us” is a real threat to the future of our Republic [my emphasis].

I travel this Congressional district every day, trying to visit every corner of it, and let people know that I am an alternative to the incumbent.  The internet is a most amazing tool. It is a tool that is available, at very low cost, throughout the world.  It is a 24/7 learning space with the power to level what is otherwise a very uneven playing field. Print media then broadcast media provided the public with a better understanding of the issues facing individual communities and ultimately the nation and world.  The internet has dramatically broadened that capability.  Discovering how to utilize this medium to reinforce the message that government is us and we can build a society that reflects the values that we have is the challenge of this campaign. I seek to advance my belief that people need to stand up for their beliefs, to be the change that they want to see in the world.  Volunteers can help by engaging in the causes and issues that they have, balancing the interests that seek to monopolize understanding for monetary gain.

CCJ: What are your top concerns for the state of Colorado? How do you intend to help residents there?

KB: My principle concerns Colorado and America are protecting the environment, creating sustainable communities that value production as well as consumption, promoting diversity and stability, and freeing individuals to act in our long-term, best, interests.  Providing universal, affordable, and relevant education is at the heart of our future.


Realistically, I hope to help residents by providing an example.  Practically, I am a conduit for people and  information, trying to connect problems with solutions and people with one another.  Ideally, [I am a model]: providing an open mind and a wealth of experience to the very real challenges ahead.

CCJ: Why did you become interested in running for public office? 

KB:  I believe that registering to vote, voting, and running for office are the most patriotic activities that we can engage in as Americans.  I have long promoted this belief.  The strongest statement that I can make, is to take constructive action.  I was granted a rare opportunity and privilege.  I am trying to discover ways to learn for this experience and pass that effort on to others.

CCJ: Please tell us two model Americans whom you admire. Why do you admire them?

KB: Martin Luther King Jr., because knew injustice and tried to right it. His conviction to non-violence is one that I also share. His understanding of the fact that he might not see the end result of his efforts and trod the path with conviction is something that I aspire to.
 
Thomas Jefferson, you have to love a gardener, with a thirst for knowledge.

CCJ: Are you aware of the student lending crisis? Do you know that 1 in 3 student loans are now in default (those are statistics gathered from the U.S. Dept. of Education, and they only track loans for 2 years)? What are your thoughts on this matter?
 
KB: You have made me more aware of this crisis.  I believe that the Obama Administration and the Congress  made a critical first step in removing the “middlemen” banks from the lending environment.  We must find a way to assure that quality education is affordable to all. It must also be appropriate, truly addressing the needs and abilities of the student and society. 

CCJ: Thanks so much, Kevin, for the interview. We are eager to see you win this important seat in the U.S. House of Representatives.